Search for: "Does 1 - 75"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,941
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
A few general conclusions can be advanced about this mode of reasoning: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:10 am
R. 75(B)(2), which governs in divorce actions (A.G. had strenuously argued in the case that the juvenile rules applied) that does not make the child a proper party in a divorce action or ancillary custody proceedings. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§240.10A-3 & 10c-1. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
For example, in WCAT-2013-02657 at paras. 75-85, it was said: [85] In summary, although Ms. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:15 am
Int’l Bulkcarriers S.A., [1980] 1 All E.R. 213). [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
§§240.10A-3 & .10c-1. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
§§ 240.10A-3, 240.10C-1. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
§§ 240.10A-3, 240.10C-1. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
See CRPC Rule 1-100 and its implied exclusion of non-lawyers not employed/contracted by lawyers. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:10 am
My newest book, Tennessee Law of Civil Trial, will be released on July 1, 2014 and may be ordered now for July 1 delivery. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 1:52 pm
I’ve earned my street cred covering this biz for 28 years and starting Deadline Hollywood Daily by myself from ground zero 8 1/2 years ago. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court held this approach unconstitutional for (1) failing to take into account the standard error of measurement (SEM) that applies to an I.Q. score and thus renders any score number imprecise as a measure of intellectual disability and, therefore, for (2) failing to allow a condemned prisoner with an I.Q. score between 71 and 75 the opportunity to offer other evidence of intellectual disability, including adaptive deficits. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
Instead it follows its own method, but does not always satisfy state requirements. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
While, unlike the OVDP, a “quiet disclosure” does not “guarantee” a taxpayer of no criminal prosecution, the practical result and the experience of practitioners who have assisted clients who have made quiet disclosures is that there is a very small likelihood of a criminal prosecution for two principal reasons: (1) Voluntary compliance results and is generally encouraged in our tax system, and (2) there is little to no incentive to… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
This position gives rise to the following questions:1) Is the exercise of the power to promulgate Ordinances amenable to judicial review (is it justiciable)? [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:43 pm
To be sure, an IQ of 75 does not necessarily mean that the defendant wins; this merely permits the defendant to present evidence of poor adaptive functioning. [read post]
