Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2721 - 2740
of 3,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 10:48 am
In order to obtain a patent in the United States it is necessary to file a US patent application. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am
This point is confusing as stated because no one, to my knowledge, has claimed that the burden of proof is an absolute probability that is stated or arrived at independently of evidence in the case. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:53 am
Council 15 Local 159 v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 7:30 am
In the present case, the parties agreed that the OFCCP’s request for information is akin to an administrative subpoena. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:27 pm
From Ganske v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:52 pm
Electronic Corp. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:21 pm
See, e.g., Poe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 6:36 am
Do these documents fully account for the SCC’s important ruling in the ESAC v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am
He noted that the Indian provisions were akin to conduit safe harbour provisions in the EU directive. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:58 am
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 3:06 pm
The Court pointed out that in True v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 11:30 pm
In the landmark decision SEC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 9:21 am
Haldeman v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
The most famous case on executive privilege is United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Looking around, we observe a political oligarchy (Congress) seamed with money and celebrity, hardly able to govern, increasingly irrelevant even as it remains at the heart of an old “republican” constitution; passionate demands (our commentators call them “populism”) for more than the state can summon the will or means to provide, from real economic security to dignity and recognition in a fragmented society (our commentators call it “polarization”),… [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 2:00 am
In New Jersey, an appellate panel in Denike v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:01 am
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 10:29 pm
Co. v. [read post]
