Search for: "In Re a & M Operating Co., Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 564
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2015, 11:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Don’t want to use legal bypasses to represent them as something they’re not. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Essentially Lord Neuberger had some sympathy with the approach but not enough to reverse a century of settled English law.South Africa: Caterham Car Sales & Coachworks Ltd v Birkin Cars (Pty) Ltd which is similar to ConAgra [43]Hong Kong: Ten-Ichi Co Ltd v Jancar Ltd which however is contradicted by a more recent decision of the Court of Final Appeal in In re Ping An Securities Ltd [44]Singapore: Several cases were discussed, but the leading case of Staywell Hospitality Group… [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:04 pm by Nate Russell
Seek co-operation of opposing counsel to facilitate data collection and holding, and limit scope and costs of production. [read post]
4 May 2015, 4:47 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The law itself didn’t define “signage” or “advertising,” and applied to any non-exempt “[m]anufacturer” who produces, sells, distributes, or licenses GE products that are sold in or into Vermont, with no requirement that the signage and advertising occur in Vermont. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ The respondent in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 7:52 am by John Elwood
Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 14-144 (involving a First Amendment challenge to license plate restrictions), and Bullard v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
The conference, co-chaired by its architects Neil J. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Dean Foods Co. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
And the United States Navy was ahead of Selikoff in terms of detailing the difficulty in controlling confined-space asbestos lagging operations onboard ships, and the consequent asbestosis hazards[5]. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
” 960 F.2d at 333 n.9 (3d Cir. 1992) (citing Third Circuit Internal Operating Procedure 5.6 (July 1990)). [read post]