Search for: "United States v. Butler"
Results 261 - 280
of 466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2013, 8:08 am
The First Sale Doctrine in the Digital Age Moderator: Karyn Temple Claggett, Associate Register of Copyrights and Director of Policy & International Affairs, United States Copyright Office Previous Copyright Office study concluded that first sale only covers distribution and thus doesn’t apply in digital context where reproductions are involved. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:08 am
First, the district saw through the argument that the claimed benzene-APL LNT model was good science because the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relies upon it. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:03 pm
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH, ET AL., No. 11-0265 Opinion of the Court Dissenting Applying its decision today in ROBERT MASTERSON, MARK BROWN, GEORGE BUTLER... v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:38 pm
Butler v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
In other blog coverage on Butler v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
By Jim Butler and the Global Hospitality Group® Hotel Lawyers | Authors of www.HotelLawBlog.com 18 June 2013 Hotel Lawyers on "hotel condo" units as securities (or NOT). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Turner noted that in Butler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
”); United States Postal Serv. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Static Control Components, in which it will consider who has the right to bring a false advertising claim under the federal Lanham Act; and United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 8:20 am
Hurley and the Associated Press also cover the Court’s grant in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 6:17 am
United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8, a recent cert. petition that asks the Court to decide whether states can protect the right of unions to picket on private property even when a business owner, the property owner, doesn’t want them there; the Justices are scheduled to consider the case at their June 6 Conference. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 10:44 am
The Sad State of Indigent Defense 50 Years after Gideon v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm
Writing in the Guardian Patrick Butler pointed out that whereas the recent turnaround which saw families with disabled children being exempted was vaunted as a gesture towards decency and common sense, it was in fact the case that the government had been forced into an embarrassing climb down in the case of Gorry v Wiltshire and the Secretary of State where they fought tooth and nail to not have disabled children exempted. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
On the 2012 Roundtable, see, Paper Delivered at the 2012 Penn State Law and Semiotics Roundtable: The Corporation as Semiosis, “Citizens United,” the Signification of the Corporate Enterprise and the Development of Law Law at the End of the Day, March 3, 2012; on the 2011 Roundtable see Larry Catá Backer, The 2011 Kevelson Workshop on Law and Semiotics at Penn State--Outstanding Student Presentations, Law at the End of the Day, April 11,… [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 1:19 pm
Most recently, in 2004, the Supreme Court echoed this point by concluding, in United States v. [read post]
