Search for: "U.S. v. Harris"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 3,273
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2022, 1:21 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit concluded today in Peltier v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) the U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 6:28 am
Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Harry Barko v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 12:00 pm
The U.S. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 2:59 pm
” Bilski v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
Harris), state or federal court (see his dissent in Michigan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The Press Gazette had a piece “Why Harry and Megan are better equipped to protect their privacy in England then Canada”. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
” The case of Martinez-Hidalgo v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
On this point, he highlighted the following statement from the U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:02 am
Harris, 890 F.3d 480, 492 (4th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
”[37] More specifically, the U.S. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
U.S. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Although Cawthorn lost his primary on May 17, the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:09 pm
U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
Circuit case, Rangel v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:31 am
Harris Methodist Forth Worth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
