Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 2881 - 2900
of 7,092
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 4:56 am
State of California (2023) 98 Cal. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 4:46 pm
Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 3:04 am
Supreme Court issued its landmark opinion in Sosa v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
The decision of the United States District Court forthe Middle District of Alabama in McNair v. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 8:00 pm
However, a strong dissent by one panel member argued that the majority had misapplied the guidance from the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:18 am
Although the text pretty strongly favors Roche, Stanford and the United States (as amicus) presented a strong policy case for public ownership of publicly funded inventions. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:08 am
An issue of the day was Guantánamo; specifically, what was the United States to do now that the U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Otherwise, Huck is refreshingly strong stuff. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 10:26 am
I did not know much about the United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:14 pm
Instead, in 1998, the United States Supreme Court confirmed that the main federal anti-discrimination law (Title VII, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Collins is a continuation of aggressive, formalist opinions by the Roberts Court on separation of powers issues, striking down numerous agency arrangements with barely a nod to originalist sources.In United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
United States, 16-5454. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:57 am
From ScotusBlog: Title: United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and the similar case of Farha V. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:46 am
Justice Elena Kagan is not participating in this case. * United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
Following TRIPs, there was a sentiment that rich countries had forced an overly strong one-sided system of strong IP on developing countries. [read post]
