Search for: "People v Ball" Results 301 - 320 of 1,091
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2012, 4:47 am by David Feldman
The argument is that fining people for not doing something is unconstitutional as exceeding the government’s right to regulate interstate commerce. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Of course, nobody likes to be on the wrong side of creative destruction’s wrecking ball, but it can be indispensable and revitalizing, even for ideological movements. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
I know of only one appellate case that authorized a similar order, People v. [read post]
28 Aug 2010, 12:16 pm by Mirriam Seddiq
A young lawyer linked to this article in Time Magazine that talks about a decision by the 9th circuit in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 4:42 pm
The Supreme Court continued its trend of significant decisions today, issuing rulings in favor of copyright holders over technological innovation (ABC v Aereo) and in favor of upholding privacy rights in the face of police searches (Riley v California). [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am by Derek Muller
But, unsubstantiated outrage and hyperbole may not help move the ball. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 5:27 am
Decision of the Day reported on Committee on the Conduct of Attorneys v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 2:51 pm by Jane S. Schacter
It traces back to his confirmation hearing, where he famously analogized judges to mere “umpires” tasked with calling “balls and strikes. [read post]