Search for: "State of Miss. v. United States" Results 3261 - 3280 of 4,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2010, 10:26 am by Jon
States are barred by a Supreme Court precedent, Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Following the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Evans, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia was tasked with ruling on Clayton County’s motion to dismiss Bostock’s complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Following the Eleventh Circuit’s decision in Evans, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia was tasked with ruling on Clayton County’s motion to dismiss Bostock’s complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:00 pm
 Once a person becomes a Supreme Court justice, no concern should exist  about being pleasing enough to senators and the president to get onto a higher court (and getting elevated to a higher court or retained on the existing court, when it comes to some state courts,  should not be a concern with any judge on any court); this is the highest court the United States ever has had. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:54 pm by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 395 U.S. 6, 33, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 1546, 23 L.Ed.2d 57;  Tot v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 3:39 pm by Monica Schreiber
“Jonathan’s target is the entire tradition of constitutional judicial review in the United States, beginning with Marbury v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm by Marie Louise
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 11:06 am by Eric Goldman
” The court explains: The Order expresses “the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 6:47 pm by Marie Louise
(IP finance) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC: In re Katz (part 2): Indefiniteness of computer processes (Patently-O) CAFC: Altair illustrates how to win by losing: Altair v Leddynamics (IPBiz) District Court E D Wisconsin: In Re Seagate does not dictate standard for pleading willful infringement claim: Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et. al. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:36 am by Graeme Hall
The United Kingdom Immigration Law Blog offers a roundup of legal immigration news: Points-based system, switching, etcetera. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 10:35 pm
(Judge Randolph's statement that there is no common law jurisdiction misses the point; as the Supreme Court explained in INS v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 2:48 pm by Mark Walsh
Alexander to repeat the line he has missed. [read post]