Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 3641 - 3660
of 4,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2012, 12:50 pm
See Cox v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 7:18 am
The Judge in the present case therefore considered the precise scope of Mayne Pharma disclosure. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 12:04 pm
Downs v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
But, that his statement lacks his customary precision. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:33 pm
On the evidentiary dispute, concerning the use of statistical evidence, the government — like Tyson — relied upon the Court’s 1946 ruling in Anderson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The case isn’t intriguing because the issue of striking jurors because of their race is new; the case is intriguing precisely because three decades since the Supreme Court made clear that prosecutors (and the rule has since been extended to all lawyers in all cases) cannot use race as the basis for even a single peremptory challenge (in Batson v. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 10:26 am
[viii] At a minimum, they should meet the policy standards adopted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) that inform federal government contracting IT compliance requirements, and which are often followed by state and municipal governmental agencies,[ix] along with the standards propagated by agency-level AI Governance Boards. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
They concluded that long-term monitoring violated the defendant’s reasonable expectation of privacy, without regard to the precise technology installed or used by the government. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:01 am
Feltman, No. 1:08CV371, 2008 US Dist. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Supreme CourtØ Public Citizen's Sup Ct Watch list for 4/3 Conf hereØ SCOTUSblog's Petitions to Watch for 4/3 Conf hereØ Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Lane (1989) and Griffith v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
” Slip op. at 62 (quoting from Gerber v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
We caution employers from using a specific end date unless both parties are clear that the employee will be engaged for a fixed term. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
We caution employers from using a specific end date unless both parties are clear that the employee will be engaged for a fixed term. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
Davis v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:07 pm
Circuit’s hearing in Trump v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 5:41 pm
Khan v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:49 am
Allen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:38 pm
In Unfair Contract Terms: improving standards in consumer contracts (January 2012) the FCA is generally critical of “unilateral variation” clauses. [read post]
