Search for: "READING RADIO, INC." Results 361 - 380 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2018, 1:18 pm by Richard Hunt
The plaintiffs in the new lawsuit appear to want Facebook to read the minds of its advertisers so it can prohibit advertising by those with bad intentions. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel One: The New World of Digital Advertising: Technologies and Business Models Part 1 Moderator: Emily Bazelon, Slate Magazine and Yale Law School Scott Spencer, Google Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled a class-action lawsuit against TikTok concerning children’s privacy violations can proceed, SMO v TikTok Inc. and Others [2022] EWHC 489 (QB). [read post]
McCarley is part of the Screen Actors Guild – American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), an American labor union representing actors, voiceover artists, journalists, singers, radio personalities, and other media professionals. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:45 am by Brett J. Rosen
Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc., 293 U.S. 1, the Supreme Court stated that “there is a presumption of [patent] validity [that is] not to be overthrown except by clear and cogent evidence. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 11:53 am by Jeanine Cali
The draft document was first read by President Lincoln to his cabinet on July 22, 1862. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 11:02 am by Ron Miller
Moreover, this reading of the wage order was also most consistent with Section 226.7 of the California Labor Code. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 6:26 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Nov. 18, 2013), involves an anti-trust challenge to the 2008 merger of Sirius Satellite Radio, Inc. and XM Satellite Holdings, Inc. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:15 pm by Fred Goldsmith
CSX Transportation, Inc., 2010 WL 1372296 (D.N.J. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
Norwood Realty, Inc., the letter of intent contained language that was explicitly binding.[46] The court held the letter of intent fell into the first category: Here, the intent of the parties to be bound by the letter of intent is not left to inference from the terms of their agreement but is twice expressly stated in prominent parts of the letter of intent. [read post]