Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al"
Results 3921 - 3940
of 8,447
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm
Team Members: Joseph Fortunato (3L), Sameer Ponkshe (3L) In this year’s competition titled United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
While another case—Chamber of Commerce et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2015, 10:01 pm
Stewart Parnell et al was close enough to perfection to easily pass muster. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:28 pm
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:53 pm
Moreover, Lilly et al. also contended that HEC Pharm specifically intended for health care providers, and/or patients to use HEC Pharm's products in accordance with the instructions provided by HEC Pharm and that such use would directly infringe one or more claims of the '703 patent. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:23 am
Ostrom et al., Examining Trial Trends in State Courts: 1976-2002, 1 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 755, 768 (2004).] [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm
United States A libel claim brought by a Philadelphia firefighter against the New York Daily News has been dismissed. [read post]
22 May 2015, 6:10 am
On May 18, 2015, the United State Supreme Court, by a 9-0 vote, vacated and remanded the Ninth Circuit’s holding in Tibble, et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 11:28 am
By Rich McHugh The United States Supreme Court yesterday issued a unanimous opinion in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
In the ongoing series of lawsuits regarding a proposed off-shore wind power generation facility in Nantucket Sound, Plaintiffs, the Town of Barnstable and Alliance to Protect Nantucket Sound, et al sought an injunction against Massachusetts, et al regarding the Cape Wind facility The district court granted defendants' motions to dismiss after determining that the Eleventh Amendment precluded… [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:30 am
A claim that an employee organization has breached its duty of fair representation must be timely raised by the aggrieved individual2015 NY Slip Op 03810, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentAn employee organization’s duty of fair representation is the legal duty requiring the employee organization to represent every employee in the negotiating unit in good faith, regardless of whether the employee is a member of the employee organization or not.In Cox v Subway Surface… [read post]
15 May 2015, 1:29 pm
Associate Director & Fellow at the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Flooding from Hurricane Katrina constitutes a taking of property without just compensation by the United States government, according to a recent decision from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Saint Bernard Parish Government, et al., v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm
., et al., 2015COA65 (Colo. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:20 pm
., et al., 2015COA65 (Colo. [read post]
13 May 2015, 7:58 am
Oliva et al. v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:00 am
Public pension reform effort by the Illinois State Legislature ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of IllinoisIn re Pension Reform Litigation, [Doris Heaton, et al,] v Pat Quinn, Governor, State of Illinois, et al, Supreme Court of Illinois, 2015 IL Docket 118585, In this action the plaintiff contended the Act amending Illinois Pension Code (40 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) by reducing retirement annuity benefits for individuals who… [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
Subsection (b) is triggered by “[t]he filing of a suit against any employee of a 4 governmental unit” and bars a future suit “against the governmental unit. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:44 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
7 May 2015, 11:31 am
To be sure, there were scientists who looked carefully at the IARC’s stated bases and found them inadequate, inconsistent, and incoherent[8]. [read post]
