Search for: "Curtiss Wright"
Results 21 - 40
of 181
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2015, 10:26 am
But if Curtiss-Wright mattered at all in the legal reasoning of past OLC opinions, we might safely assume the newly official opprobrium in which Curtiss-Wright is held should at least somewhat alter the calculation. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 9:25 am
Ebert, Festo, Foreseeability and the Wright Brothers, Intellectual Property Today, February 2004. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 8:21 am
Page 207 discusses the prodigious stream of inventions of Curtiss. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Curtiss-Wright Corp. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 3:14 am
On the other hand, the case is ultimately decided on quite narrow reasoning, the famous Curtiss-Wright dicta is roundly criticized, and much of the Court’s functional reasoning is narrowly tailored to the context of recognition. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 6:08 am
"After winning his case against the Selden patent, one recalls Henry Ford offered his lawyer to Glenn Curtiss to fight the Wright Brothers.The review also mentions used by Kearns-->In his decades-long fight for justice, Kearns cycled through several lawyers well-known in patent circles, including William Durkee of Arnold White & Durkee (now part of Howrey) and Richard Aitken of Lane, Aitken & McCann (now part of Venable). [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:35 pm
[In passing, IPBiz found the text "A man named Glenn Curtiss" curious, because Glenn Curtiss, in the context of the Wright Brothers, needs no introduction. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 11:07 am
Shortly thereafter, Curtiss-Wright terminated Quinlan’s employment for breach of company policies and theft of company property. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:53 pm
The firms include Cincinnati Bell, Hercules Offshore, Curtiss-Wright, Intersil, and Helix Energy Solutions. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:30 pm
Curtiss-Wright Corp., A-51-09, which was argued before the New Jersey Supreme Court on March 9, 2010. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
This week we received Birdmen: The Wright Brothers, Glenn Curtiss, and the Battle to Control the Skies, by Lawrence Goldstone, an epic account of patent litigation enlivened by the romance of invention and flight, published by a subsidiary of Random House. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 9:00 am
The Court flatly “decline[d] to acknowledge” that the President has “broad, undefined powers over foreign affairs” and characterized as dicta Curtiss-Wright’s language on the sole-organ theory. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
On the other hand, the case is ultimately decided on quite narrow reasoning, the famous Curtiss-Wright dicta is roundly criticized, and much of the Court’s functional reasoning is narrowly tailored to the context of recognition. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:23 am
Recall the outcome of the Wright/Curtiss wars.link: http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2014/05/11/why-apple-is-fighting-the-patent-battle-so-hard-what-other-protection-from-the-competition-does-it-have/ [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 10:00 am
However, the sole-organ error in Curtiss-Wright (1936) was not corrected by the Court until its decision in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
It brings to a close the Reagan era “Curtiss-Wright so I’m right cite. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:11 am
That dispute is ongoing and subject to arbitration in Sweden, Curtiss-Wright said. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 9:15 am
The pre-petition claims relate to two casings that were sold to Curtiss-Wright. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 10:19 am
This is not a direct theft, because Curtiss did not claim that Curtiss developed the first viable flying machine, but it is a theft, because Curtiss was trying to steal credit from the Wright Brothers so that Curtiss could evade the patent of the Wright Brothers and benefit Curtiss. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm
Koch moved to the Soviet Union and built refineries for Stalin in the 1930s – developing deep-seated hatred for both Communists and lawyers.The discussion of the Wright Brothers and Curtiss given by Forbes was misleading. [read post]
