Search for: "Gray v. Hand"
Results 21 - 40
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 11:10 am
Fish & Richardson, Ropes & Gray v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 7:15 am
Judgment was handed down today in the privacy case of Zac Goldsmith and others v BCD ([2011] EWHC 674 (QB)). [read post]
10 Mar 2006, 12:19 am
On the other hand, Mr. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
Implicated in Costco v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
Peterson has appealed his case, which is now entitled Peterson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
Peterson has appealed his case, which is now entitled Peterson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2008, 6:31 pm
Defenders of Wildlife v. [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:43 am
On the other hand, in a purchase transaction where cash changes hands, the consumer must input payment information at some point. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
It was an unusually fast approval process, with three applications hand-delivered by Bell's lawyer on February 14, mere hours before a competing application was submitted by engineer Elisha Gray. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 7:00 am
" My Health, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 9:56 pm
I wrote previously about Woodward v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
It has already led to a 2009 libel action in which Sir Charles Gray awarded Mr Levi £50,000 damages against Mr Bates (Levi v Bates ([2009] EWHC 1495 (QB)). [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:00 pm
The case of John Ray v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
City of Canton v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 6:29 am
Facts: This case (Richard Gray v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am
*Citing Paul v NYC Department of Education, 146 AD3d 705, the Appellate Division, rejecting Coach's contention that hearsay testimony should not have been admitted at the hearing, holding that the hearing officer "was entitled to rely on hearsay" in sustaining the U-Rating give Coach. * In Gray v Adduci, 73 NY2d 741, the Court of Appeals said that it was well established that "hearsay evidence can be the basis of an administrative determination. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Paul Rothstein, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center, addressed the use of hearsay in a criminal trial in his review of Ohio v Clark,* a decision recently handed down by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 11:03 am
On the other hand, in Vielbig v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:16 am
especially a nice dinnerTo be protected a belief must relate to matters which a more than merely trivial, possess an adequate degree of seriousness and it must be a belief on a fundamental problem (R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education, paragraph 23), although the belief does not need to govern the entirety of a person’s life (Grainger v Nicholson, paragraph 27).In the initial Employment Tribunal decision in Gray, the Tribunal did not accept that Ms… [read post]
