Search for: "In re First Judicial Cir."
Results 21 - 40
of 1,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 2:09 pm
Among many noteworthy advances during his tenure, the court completed its migration to electronic case filing with more than 70,000 attorneys currently registered to use the system, and expanded the use of cameras in the courtroom, becoming the first and currently only federal appellate court to live video stream oral arguments on the Internet.Also effective today, amended FRAP 6 re BAP appeals. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 6:19 pm
In re Nitro Fluids LLC (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
And it's the first line of the concurrence. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:02 am
Cy’s Crab House N., Inc., 731 F.3d 725, 730 (7th Cir. 2013); In re Synthroid Mktg. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:43 am
LEXIS 8263 (1st Cir. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 7:35 am
In Re: Volkswagen and Audi Warranty, 2012 WL 3064844 (1st Cir. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in In re Bal Harbour Club, Inc., 316 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2003), explained that “[t]he business judgment rule is a judicial presumption that corporate officers and directors acted in good faith, even if their actions were ultimately detrimental to the corporation. [read post]
29 Sep 2004, 12:28 pm
The First Circuit keeps fidgeting with Almendarez-Torres. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 4:06 am
Busher v Barry The question of first impression was addressed by S.D.N.Y. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:51 pm
First National Bank of Keystone, 222 B.R. 872 (9th Cir. 1998). [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
Despite the confusing verbiage, these judicial rulings are a serious deviation from the text of Rule 702, as well as the Advisory Committee Note to the 2000 Amendments, which embraced the standard articulated in In re Paoli, that “any step that renders the analysis unreliable . . . renders the expert’s testimony inadmissible. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
In re VerHoef, 888 F.3d 1362, 1365 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:59 pm
Lexis 140, slip op. (9th Cir. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 7:29 pm
In re Janssen and NYU (Johnson & Johnson) (Fed. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
It doesn't take your money because you "might" get it if you're pardoned, etc. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
But the First Circuit noted the consolidation in In re Application of Astra Medica, S.A., 981 F.2d 1, 3 n.2 (1st Cir. 1992).Given the number of participants in the Lago Agrio litigation (Ecuador and various Ecuadorian officials, the Lago Agrio plaintiffs themselves, Chevron, each of the US persons from whom the parties are seeking discovery), it’s surprising to me that no one has made a motion to the JPML for consolidation. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:21 am
By Chris Reaves A recent appeal of a lengthy prosecution ended last week, when the Federal Circuit in In re Hyon, 102 USPQ2d 1889 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 1:40 pm
" In re IBP Confidential Bus. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 12:52 pm
Cir. 2006), which is a total of seven opinions granting and seven denying. [read post]
Two Strykes and You're Out - Fed. Cir. Reverses on Obviousness, and Orders Reassignment to New Judge
9 Jun 2010, 9:48 am
In the first go-around, the district court found non-infringement as a matter of law, and the Fed. [read post]
