Search for: "In re J. G." Results 21 - 40 of 2,152
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2014, 5:25 am
The trial court, Dewey, J., denied the second motion on the ground that it raised the same claim as the first motion and, therefore, was barred by the doctrine of res judicata. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:48 pm by Wells Bennett
As we noted earlier today, documents bearing on the In Re Directives litigation have now been declassified. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:45 am by EEM
" Includes "Passages de frontières des Palestiniens du Liban : de refuges en migrations" and "Franchir les dispositifs établis par Frontex: Coopérations policières transfrontalières et refoulements en mer Égée. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Durant la procédure orale devant la division d'opposition, les parties étaient d'accord sur le fait que D7 enseignait les caractéristiques a) à g) et i), le débat portant sur les caractéristiques h) et j).La décision explique que la caractéristique h) (le caractère centré du dispositif de distribution 6) était évidente, mais est totalement muette quant à la… [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
G 5/83 [2-5]; G 1/07 [3.1]; G 2/08 [4]). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Under the principles laid down in the decisions T 14/89 and J 13/90, there is a legitimate expectation on the part of the applicant that the EPO should draw to the applicant’s attention deficiencies in a request for re-establishment of rights which are obviously easy to correct. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 6:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The court terminated respondent-mother’s parental rights to all four children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (g), (j), and (k)(iii), and terminated respondent-father’s parental rights to his three children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (g), and (j). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 12:01 pm by Mathew Reisig
If you’re facing charges of Providing False Information for Handgun Purchase Exemption, understand that you have an uphill fight ahead of you and that prosecutors take these charges very seriously. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
After G 1/09 had issued, there was quite some speculation on whether its verdict could be transferred to the case of deemed withdrawal. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Smucker's US 6,004,596 is under re-examinationhttp://ipbiz.blogspot.com/2009/01/coffee-patent-wars-over.html [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:45 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
  The court effectively held that res judicata applies with all its force and effect to arbitration. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 4:42 am
Les TI sont une des rares solutions afin d'assurer un meilleur accès à la justice, dogme à la une des intérêts de mes confrères. 3) EN AVANT-PREMIÈRE: Une grande participation au Colloque Legal.IT que j'organise pour l'AJBM. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 2:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moore Dickson County General Sessions Judge Post Office Box 217 Charlotte, Tennessee 37036 In re: Complaint of Benjamin J. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Rule 14 EPC 1973 can prevent, as lex specialis, other acts, e.g., as in J 20/05, the filing of a divisional application (see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], and J 9/12 [3,5]). [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Hence, the applicant cannot derive any claims if this communication is either not sent (see J 12/84) or not sent to the correct addressee. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 10:59 pm
D'ailleurs, comme lui, je vous rappelle que j'ai été très gentil en donnant de la formation aux juges et aux avocats en matière technologique et m'engage à en faire autant en 2007! [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:20 am by Jack D
De manière générale, leur résidence principale est éloignée de cette résidence secondaire. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
Brillat, Ombre et lumière du Comité européen des droits sociaux G. [read post]