Search for: "Rolfe v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v Norway) (1933)Rolf Einar Fife8. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 5:01 am
Ed. 2d 561 (1963) (noting that Acts of Congress have “strong presumptive validity’); State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:20 am
Alco Electronics Limited v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
The IPKat learned yesterday that the United Kingdom's Minister for Intellectual Property, Baroness Neville-Rolfe, is to visit that sadly-troubled entity, the European Patent Office. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 1:26 pm
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
State FarmFire & Cas. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 8:59 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Bryan v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 1568 (22 July 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Children), Re [2008] EWCA Civ 842 (22 July 2008) CTI Group Inc v Transclear SA [2008] EWCA Civ 856 (22 July 2008) North Devon Homes Ltd. v Batchelor [2008] EWCA Civ 840 (22 July 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Hollis & Ors v Rolfe & Ors [2008] EWHC 1747 (Ch) (22 July 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench) Ewing… [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:21 pm
Oklahoma v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:25 am
Acting Supreme Court Justice Rolf M. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 11:02 pm
" TrafFix Devices Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:00 pm
š v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:00 am
‘There is ... no dispute that there are a significant number of grossly ineffective teachers currently active in California classrooms,’ Judge Rolf M. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:16 am
" ]. one notes that the 1961 movie Judgment at Nuremberg raised the issue[wikipedia: He [Hans Rolfe (Maximilian Schell) ] also suggests that the United States has committed acts just as bad or worse as those the Nazis perpetrated. [read post]
7 May 2015, 12:49 am
Krug, Multilateral convergence of investment company regulation Julien Chaisse, Greek debt restructuring, Abaclat v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:35 am
Secondly, how must the claimant know what he has to know – that is, what state of mind, assessed subjectively or objectively or by a mixture of the two, amounts to knowledge for this purpose (“the how? [read post]
23 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In Rua v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
