Search for: "Sandler v. Sandler"
Results 21 - 40
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 3:18 am
Plaintiffs’ theories of proximate cause are interrupted by an intervening act and are impermissibly speculative (see Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP, 170 AD3d 461, 462 [1st Dept 2019]; Excelsior Capitol LLC v K&L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 906 [2016]). [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:03 am
In addition to being able to revert to “classic version” via a button at the top right (h/t Lowenstein Sandler’s Daniel Porco), you can still use “form descriptions” to search for filings – click the “view filings” box in the top left box, and then use the “search table” box just like on the old page. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 9:14 am
Case citation: The Ohio State University v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:57 am
CafePress.com * Print-on-Demand “Publisher” Isn’t Liable for Book Contents–Sandler v. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 7:18 am
CafePress.com * Print-on-Demand “Publisher” Isn’t Liable for Book Contents–Sandler v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 12:42 pm
Recently, Maryland Chief Judge Mary Ellen Barbera wrote in State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
” — (Von Kaenel v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
Nov. 27, 2019) For a similar case in the defamation context, see Sandler v. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 9:52 am
CafePress.com * Print-on-Demand “Publisher” Isn’t Liable for Book Contents–Sandler v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 4:06 am
This concept is demonstrated by Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 01665 [170 AD3d 461] March 7, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department where the claims that plaintiff would have altered his stock selling future conduct had the attorneys given certain advice was rejected. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:43 am
Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 01665 Decided on March 7, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example of how the fourth elements comes into play. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 3:02 pm
Supreme Court entered its opinion in California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 10:54 am
Wendell v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:17 pm
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:21 am
Nonetheless, Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 32411(U) November 16, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160298/2016 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich is a good example of how the court treats a “hindsight” case. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
The case was Edward and Carmelita O’Donnell v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Sandler v. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Filed in Trump v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 3:50 am
In Lisi v Lowenstein Sandler LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 32411(U) November 16, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 160298/2016 Judge Shirley Werner Kornreich finds that where a claim might be stated, damages cannot be linked to the shortcomings. [read post]
