Search for: "Douglas Young" Results 381 - 400 of 1,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
Los demandados son la ciudad de Fort Smith, el Director de Recursos Humanos de la ciudad, Richard Jones, y seis oficiales y ex policías de la ciudad: Chris Boyd Sr., Marcos Hallum, Alan Haney, Jarrard Copeland, Greg Smithson y Dewey Youngs. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 7:20 am by Jason Rantanen
Shubha Ghosh is the Vilas Research Fellow & George Young Bascom Professor in Business Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 6:46 am by Denis Stearns
Young children are unable to practice good personal hygiene and have not yet acquired immunity to S. sonnei. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 6:53 am by William Baude
  That portion of the opinion was joined by the three other Justices who had dissented in Douglas v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Daniel Schwartz
(It’s called the McDonnell-Douglas test and I’ve talked about it on the blog before.) [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 6:19 am by Courtney Hostetler
This three-step legal test is known as the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:58 am by Rachel Tischler and Brian DeShannon*
” The Court rejected both arguments and, instead, held that the familiar McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework must be applied to Young’s claims while revising the pretext portion of the analysis. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by Melissa Raphan
To support her prima facie case under McDonnell Douglas, Young relied on evidence that UPS accommodated workers who lost their certifications, sustained on the job injuries, and suffered from disabilities under the ADA. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 8:12 am by Leiza Dolghih
This week, the United States Supreme Court issued a long-awaited ruling in Young v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 7:17 am by Kathy Kreps
Peggy Young was a part-time driver for United Parcel Service (UPS). [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:51 am by Jon Hyman
Supreme Court issued one of its most anticipated employment-law rulings of this term, in Young v. [read post]