Search for: "Holmes v. United States" Results 381 - 400 of 867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
  In the oft quoted words of Willes J in East v Holmes ((1858) 1 F&F 347, 349), “If a man wrote that all lawyers were thieves, no particular lawyer could sue him unless there was something to point to the particular individual“ In the leading English case of Knupffer v Express Newspapers ([1944] AC 116) the “Daily Express” published an article referring to “The quislings on whom Hitler flatters himself he can build a pro-German… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But as Robert Post’s magisterial Holmes Devise volumes on the Taft Court reveal, William Howard Taft succeeded in packing the Supreme Court of the United States – twice – first as a one-term president from 1909 to 1913 and again as chief justice from 1921 to 1930. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 4:33 pm by Jeremy Malcolm
It might be assumed that an extension of the copyright term in the TPP wouldn't affect the United States, because our law already provides for that same copyright term. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 10:00 am by David Kimball-Stanley
Judge Milan interpreted the phrase by looking to its use in other contexts, relying principally on Holmes v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am by Maya Manian
” It was not until Nazi Germany adopted American eugenic theory and practice that public opinion about eugenics ultimately shifted in the United States. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Vitale, “declaring that the state may not compel the recitation of a state-composed prayer in schools” Griffin v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  Kennedy's majority opinion in that case insisted on deferring to a legislative judgment that safe alternatives to partial birth abortions existed, even though every reputable medical organization in the United States disputed that claim. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 11:04 am by Peter Vodola
Co., 13 N.Y. 31 [1855]), and a few decades later the United States Supreme Court rejected it also (Grigsby v. [read post]
20 May 2015, 12:19 pm
This morning, the Sixth Circuit handed down a new case, United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 5:51 pm by Big Tent Democrat
The President's power, as stated in Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution: The President shall be commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 2:48 am by Scott Bomboy
United States, a majority of the Court upheld the act, but Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes dissented, with Justice Louis Brandeis agreeing with Holmes. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Nazi Conspiracy and Aggression 12 v. (1946-1948) Office of United States Chief of Counsel. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:21 pm by Sandy Levinson
Relatively few Americans are willing to denounce the basic legitimacy of the Court--in the way, say, that I regularly denounce the legitimacy of the indefensibly apportioned United States Senate. [read post]