Search for: "Matter of Jonathan T."
Results 381 - 400
of 2,645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2022, 8:59 am
Jonathan Robinson and Sean Trende in the Atlantic: Pundits and voters of all stripes lament just how extreme, polarized, and ideological American politics has become. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 4:56 pm
The Serbs figured that out as other Continentals will in the years ahead: if you can’t outbreed the enemy, cull ‘em. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:19 am
The claimant intends to take the matter to the Federal Constitutional Court. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
No matter what detailed corroboration they provided, advisers testified Trump responded with derision, ultimately pushing those aides aside in favor of the fringe lawyers willing to echo the false allegations. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
A new administration is of course as a general matter entitled to do that. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Katharine Young, Book Review: Adam Chilton and Mila Versteeg, How Constitutional Rights Matter, New York: Oxford University Press, 2020, (Journal of Legal Education Vol. 70, No. 1 (Fall 2020)).Mingyu Jun, The Best Interests of Children Overlooked: Should Faith Based Agencies Be Forced Out? [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 11:58 pm
Jonathan Chaplin [i] Matthew Grimley, ‘The Dog that Didn’t Bark: The Failure of Disestablishment Since 1927’, in Mark Chapman, Judith Maltby and William Whyte, eds, The Established Church: Past, Present and Future (London: T&T Clark, 2011), 39–55. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:16 am
That hasn’t happened. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:33 pm
UPDATE: Co-blogger Jonathan Adler, an expert on environmental law, has a post on the case here. [read post]
31 May 2022, 8:01 am
What are your lawyers doing in your firm’s name that you don’t know about? [read post]
28 May 2022, 7:51 am
Sorry, but I have never just "gotten over it," as the late Justice Scalia used to tell his many audiences.2) According to that flaming liberal law professor Jonathan Turley, The Ethics in Government Act of 1978 requires federal officials, including Supreme Court justices, to disclose their spouse’s income. [read post]
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Why would it matter that it doesn't take a life? [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:00 am
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University and a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors. [read post]
24 May 2022, 4:16 pm
If the matter proceeds to court, they can cast the claimant in a poor light. [read post]
24 May 2022, 9:46 am
This is not the first time I have seen a junior lawyer deputized to act on a senior partner’s personal matter, and I’m sure it won’t be the last. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
” To be sure, qualifies Dreher, “[t]his totalitarianism won’t look like the USSR’s. [read post]
20 May 2022, 4:04 am
However, the official didn’t rule out the possibility of that changing in the future, saying the State Department would have the final say. [read post]
18 May 2022, 8:30 am
What matters is the words, not those who wrote them. [read post]
16 May 2022, 4:00 am
Some states would permit such marriages; others probably wouldn’t. [read post]
