Search for: "THE UNITED STATES et al" Results 4001 - 4020 of 8,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm by Schachtman
The plaintiffs’ testifying statistician, Hongkun Wang, stated in her deposition that the fecal copper (whether isotope Cu63 or Cu65) was not different across the three groups (Fixodent, zinc acetate, and placebo). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 11:01 am by Kevin
 For obvious reasons, they should not be listening to Jane Doe 3 et al. 422 words (not counting these). [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 5:31 am by Rachel E. Burke
Kalamazoo County Road Commission, et al. should serve as a warning to all employers that statements made to employees about their FMLA eligibility may be binding, even if the employees do not meet the eligibility criteria required by the statute. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 10:43 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 8:35 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh In what perhaps can be best described as a win for traditional contract analysis, the United States Supreme Court (the “Court”) issued an opinion on January 25, 2015 in M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 6:13 am by Doorey
Against the background of recent back to work legislation affecting Air Canada workers, postal workers, and teachers, this case, Saskatchewan Federation of Labour et al v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:05 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Germany, France, Italy and Spain, as well as the United States. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 1:03 pm by Gregory B. Williams
., et al., Civil Action No. 14-435-LPS (D.Del., January 16, 2015), the Court granted defendants’ motion to transfer the action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California (“Northern District”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 12:16 pm by Dr. Shezad Malik
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., et al, case number CGC-12-518535). [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:25 am by Naumes Law
Ethicon, Inc., et al, (13-CV-22473), Ethicon’s Motion for Summary Judgment based on the Statute of Limitations was denied. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 6:24 am by assoulineberlowe
In a recent decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held in Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:10 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Formerly the executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, she served as Legislative Liaison for the Native American Rights Fund and in the Carter Administration, and was lead plaintiff in Harjo et al v. [read post]