Search for: "LaBelle v. LaBelle" Results 4101 - 4120 of 12,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2016, 3:47 am by INFORRM
In Shakeel Begg v BBC ([2016] EWHC 2688 (QB)), Haddon-Cave J held that allegations that the claimant is an extremist speaker who has promoted jihad are substantially true. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:53 am by randal shaheen
On Wednesday, November 3 at 9:00 am, the Supreme Court of California will hear oral argument in Kwikset Corporation v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Andre Hanson (US)
In our prior post, we suggested that there was an apparent split between the Apotex Panel’s ruling “that representations commensurate with information in an FDA label generally cannot form the basis for Lanham Act liability,” Apotex, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 9:20 am by Andre Hanson (US)
In our prior post, we suggested that there was an apparent split between the Apotex Panel’s ruling “that representations commensurate with information in an FDA label generally cannot form the basis for Lanham Act liability,” Apotex, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
  In a word, “no,” because off-label use inherently involves the scope of the label, which is – well – the label. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 10:48 am by Bona Law PC
As the court noted, “One could describe price fixing as a joint venture,” highlighting that the label itself does not insulate an arrangement from scrutiny. [read post]