Search for: "S. W., an individual"
Results 4101 - 4120
of 11,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 10:00 pm
IRS issues a news release reminding employers how SECURE 2.0 Act changes may affect Form W-2 information and withholding requirements. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:08 am
Sci. 905 (2020); Benjamin W. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:09 pm
The agreements provide no protection from criminal or civil prosecution for any individuals. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:47 pm
S. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Thus, the questions “[w]ho is the citizen[?] [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Thus, the questions “[w]ho is the citizen[?] [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
Thus, the questions “[w]ho is the citizen[?] [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 5:59 am
Recent practice during the George W. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
Those individuals matched the descriptions provided by the homeowner. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
S., at 385, 114 S. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:39 am
Bashman (How Appealing), Scott W. [read post]
2 May 2013, 4:43 pm
Department of Labor under former President George W. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 1:44 pm
Albert W. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 10:42 am
This little flourish was the final straw for Guardian 'Comment is free' w riter Heather McRobie, who wrote in response: "To allow - even theoretically, even 'jokingly' - unqualified individuals like William to practise undermines everything the profession stands for. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:34 am
The court denied Kuhn's motion to dismiss, concluding that Peyton had adequately alleged that Kuhn's actions were retaliation for Peyton's First-Amendment-protected complaints: "As a general matter, the First Amendment prohibits government officials from subjecting an individual to retaliatory actions for engaging in protected speech. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 8:27 am
Kaplan ruled that the government’s successful efforts to force KPMG to cut off defense costs for the individual defendants by threatening to indict the entity itself amounted to a violation of the defendants’ Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:51 am
The Court says, for example, that “[w]e have been given no reason to believe that Congress saw as a problem, or wanted to eliminate, the State Department’s role in determinations regarding individual official immunity. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:20 am
Employers, particularly larger ones, expect the Supreme Court to uphold the ACA but strike down the individual mandate. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:25 am
S. 709, 718, n.7 (2005) (“[W]e are a court of review, not first view. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
This means that it is easier to pin down an individual’s precise location in an urban area than in a rural one. [read post]
