Search for: "ART GRAHAM"
Results 401 - 420
of 805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 2:04 pm
Davis at least recognizes there's some complexity to the problem.Lee Rosenbaum has lots more coverage, including this astonishing quote from the museum's director, Graham Beal:"[O]ur concern has been not to have [gifts] restricted, so the DIA would be able to deaccession that art to buy different art. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:48 am
(Tell me again ....)Now, in fairness to the museum's director, Graham Beal, the quotes attributed to him in the story don't support that headline. [read post]
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
(citing Graham v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am
A workshop organized by HKBU and Tsinghua University, Communication & Visual Arts Building, Hong Kong Baptist University. [read post]
2 May 2013, 6:24 am
Mon, Apr 22 2013 04:43:56 ReplyRetweetFavorite Gustavo Arballo@GustArballo Don @albovino sobre prueba preconstituida por particulares en el proceso penal (a favor) feedly.com/k/10QXCsx Tue, Apr 09 2013 12:37:00 ReplyRetweetFavorite Gustavo Arballo@GustArballo "Graham and the Problem of Predicting Lifecourse Offenders". [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
A workshop organized by HKBU and Tsinghua University, Communication & Visual Arts Building, Hong Kong Baptist University. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:08 am
So overall, I think the decision sort of de-conceptualizes the art and treats it as merely a bunch of marks on a surface -- very old-timey and reductionist. [read post]
31 Mar 2013, 10:19 pm
Const, Art. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:50 am
However, the rod shape patented by Graham does notbecome patentable again by virtue of Cooke’s stated preference for spheresover other shapes. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:36 am
Graham v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
In order to determine whether a prima facie case of obviousness has been established, we consider the factors set forth in Graham v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:55 am
An improvement in the art is obvious if "it is likely the product not of innovation but of ordinary skill and common sense. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:25 pm
The paper largely defends the USPTO's examination of software patenting by showing that its approach in the software arts is essentially the same as in other fields. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 11:08 am
Kitch, Graham v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 8:33 am
Teleflex Inc., 550 U.S. at 421(citing Graham v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 2:49 am
However, that ultimate conclusion is based upon a set of factual underpinnings as explained by Graham v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 10:39 am
Of course, some have the voice of Billy Graham or James Earl Jones but those are few and far between. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Id. at 406 (citing Graham v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:15 am
” Kahn, 441 F.3d at 986 (quoting Graham v John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 36 (1966)). [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:26 pm
See also In re Kuhle, 526 F.2d 553, 555 (CCPA 1975) (use of claimed feature solves no stated problem and presents no unexpected result and “would be an obvious matter of design choice within the skill of the art” (citing Graham v. [read post]
