Search for: "SANDOZ, INC." Results 401 - 420 of 679
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am by Bexis
Optical Radiation Corp., 22 F.3d 540, 544 (3d Cir. 1994); Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:12 pm
Introvale birth control pills by Sandoz. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:09 pm by Schachtman
., Inc., 874 F.2d 307, 311 (5th Cir. 1989) (noting that “[o]ne difficulty with epidemiologic studies is that often several factors can cause the same disease. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Courtenay Brinckerhoff
Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit upheld the district court’s determination that the claims at issue were neither obvious nor invalid under the doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting based on a “lead compound” approach to the obviousness... [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:40 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit clarified the differences between obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting for a chemical composition-of-matter invention. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Sandoz, Inc. 3:12-cv-01617; filed March 14, 2012 in the District Court of New Jersey Infringement of U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:47 pm
A quick search reveals that this phrase had been previously used by Sir Robin in Leo Pharma A/S v Sandoz Ltd, [2009] EWCA Civ 1188 and before that in Bristol Myers Squibb Co v Baker Norton Pharmaceuticals Inc, [1999] RPC 253. [read post]