Search for: "UNION COUNTY, ILLINOIS" Results 441 - 460 of 963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 2:46 pm by Lindsay Colvin Stone
In accordance with Illinois law (the “Illinois Law”), the Union collected approximately $535 per year from Janus in the form of agency fees, which constituted 78.06% of full union dues. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am by Matthew Forys
The example given in Illinois shows how objectors are left in the dark about the final numbers. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 7:35 pm by Betty S.W. Graumlich and Adam Weiner
The Decision In Janus, the plaintiff, an Illinois state employee, challenged the requirement that he pay “agency fees” to a union of which he was not a member. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:47 pm by Aaron Lindstrom
Mark Janus, for example, works as a child support specialist for Illinois, and he was concerned about Illinois’ fiscal crises. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm by Mark Walsh
American, Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees today. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm by lennyesq
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, Dkt. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
S. ____ (2018).Petitioner Mark Janus, an Illinois state employee whose collective bargaining unit is represented by a public-sector union [Union], refused to join the Union because he opposes many of its positions, including those taken by the Union in the course of collective bargaining. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am by Tammy Binford
Brenneman, an attorney with Fox, Swibel, Levin & Carroll, LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, says. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am by Tammy Binford
Brenneman, an attorney with Fox, Swibel, Levin & Carroll, LLP, in Chicago, Illinois, says. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:14 am by Amy Howe
Janus – who is not a union member – challenged the $45 per month that is deducted from his paycheck to go to the local branch of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, the union that represents him. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:47 pm by Mark Walsh
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm by Mark Walsh
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees Council 31, about whether public-employee unions may continue to collect agency fees from those members of a bargaining unit, such as Janus, who decline to join the union. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:42 am by Bill Marler
A & R Bar-be-que Salmonella Outbreak Lawsuit – Tennessee (2009) Adrift Restaurant Salmonella Outbreak Lawsuits – Washington (2005) Andrew and Williamson Fresh Produce Salmonella Outbreak Lawsuits – Multistate (2015) Antioch Farms’ Salmonella Outbreak Lawsuit – Minnesota (2014) Baker Street Restaurant Salmonella Outbreak Lawsuit – Wisconsin (2010) Beaches Sandy Bay Resort Salmonella Outbreak Litigation – Jamaica (2005) Black Forest Bakery Salmonella… [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:53 am by Philip Bobbitt
” On its face, this provision is unlimited; that is, unlike other enumerated powers provided in the Constitution—Congress shall have power “to provide for calling forth the Militia [in order] to execute the laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions,” or in order “to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, [Congress may secure] for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:52 am by Aaron Lancaster and John Busch
Finkly & Sons Co. filed a putative class action against the company in Cook County, Illinois, for violations of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Louis County Charter Amendments from August Primary Ballot” by Jeremy Kohler for St. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, which asks whether an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, would mean for teachers unions, concluding that “[b]y causing teachers unions to return to collective action on behalf of their members, the Supreme Court decision may, in the end, invigorate the unions that… [read post]