Search for: "State v. McDonnell "
Results 461 - 480
of 634
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2010, 6:35 pm
The gender discrimination claim was also dismissed.The case is Schechner v CBS Broad Inc., NDCal, July 14, 2010. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:58 am
State action. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:28 pm
Significantly, the employer took no adverse action until it received clear evidence of her improper disclosure and of her falsification of an employment application (Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
” That case is Brady v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 3:30 am
” That case is Brady v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
Patrick McDonnell summarized the oral argument in the Supreme Court’s Collins v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 9:01 am
" Winterhalter's discrimination/retaliation case was reviewed under the McDonnell Douglas tri-partite burden shifting analysis. [read post]
10 May 2016, 11:20 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
Judge Ludington dissented (Moffat v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 6:59 am
” She stated that employees were required to contact her, before 8:00 am, if they were going to be absent or late. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 9:01 pm
Since the ruling in Young v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 2:00 am
Evans v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:52 pm
Those decisions, which upheld employers’ affirmative action plans against Title VII challenges, called for application of the three-step burden-shifting framework set forth by the High Court in McDonnell Douglas Corp v Green (3 EPD ¶8607). [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:17 am
See, e.g., Board ofTrade ofCity ofChicago v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
The district court got it wrong here (Connelly v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:52 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit agreed with Silver’s contention that jury instructions in his trial were erroneous in light of the decision handed down in McDonnell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:00 pm
And thus, as the mock courtroom filled with laughs and applause, the case of Rogers v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:48 am
Judge Sutton concurred in part and dissented in part (Marshall v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 8:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
