Search for: "United States v. Barnett"
Results 461 - 480
of 507
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
The brief was on behalf of Professors of Second Amendment Law (including VC's Randy Barnett), Cato Institute, John Locke Foundation, Center to Keep and Bear Arms (Mountain States Legal Foundation), and Independence Institute. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
United States Summer Zervos, a former contestant of The Apprentice has presented evidence in court filings to support her claims that the President Trump sexually assaulted her in a hotel room in 2007. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:20 pm
Steve Barnett made similar points on Inforrm. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
27 May 2018, 4:36 pm
Steven Barnett considered the influence of the press on the decision here. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Doug Berman (Sentencing Law and Policy) quotes some of my own favorite parts of the Constitution and opines that the criminal-law related provision given the least respect or attention in modern times is the Reprieves-and-Pardons Clause of Article II (“The President … shall have Power to Grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offenses against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment”). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Barnett, in each of these circuits.) [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
’’ Kumho Tire Co. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm
If you listened to the oral arguments in front the Supreme Court, and you thought that some of the questions being asked by the Justices displayed an inability to comprehend the basic functioning of health insurance in the United States, congratulations. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 2:51 am
Ceballos and Rust v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
In the case of Doherty v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 9:48 am
As Randy Barnett and Jeff Rosen have recognized, the Chief Justice’s tax-power analysis in NFIB v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Our role is very clear: We are to interpret the Constitution and laws of the United States and ensure that the political branches act within them. [read post]
