Search for: "State v. Loss" Results 4901 - 4920 of 17,508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Brian D. Iton
However, as the New Jersey Supreme Court stated in the case of Mani v. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:30 am by Stuart Mauney
In the complaint (which was of course filed in state court), the personal representative of the estate alleges that Grandma “had hoof prints on her forehead, and incriminatin’ Claus marks on her back. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
 In general, an indictment that tracks the words of a statute to state the elements crime is acceptable, provided that it states sufficient facts to place a defendant on notice of the specific conduct at issue. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:26 pm by Law Lady
Contracts -- Torts -- Jurisdiction -- Non-residents -- Law firm's action against former client for breach of contract and against former client's attorney for tortious interference with contract -- Allegations that out-of-state client breached contract with Florida attorneys by failing to make payment in state were sufficient to bring former client within ambit of long-arm statute -- Former client had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida where she voluntarily contracted with… [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:37 am by richardhunt
Missing out on the extra money isn’t a tragedy and for many plaintiffs’ attorneys saving the additional filing fees for a state court action and avoiding pleading requirements that are hard to meet in cookie cutter lawsuits makes this loss worthwhile. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:15 pm by Ron Krauss
While reiterating its general rule that mandamus is “a drastic remedy that is seldom issued and its use is discouraged,” the Third Circuit nevertheless found “the kind of extraordinary situation in which we are empowered to issue the writ of mandamus,” in United States v. [read post]