Search for: "Doe v. Doe" Results 4921 - 4940 of 152,596
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing S.C. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 97 AD3d 518, 519-520, quoting Shor v Touch-N-Go Farms, Inc., 89 AD3d 830, the Appellate Division explained that in order "[to] establish a cause of action based on negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision [of an employee], it must be shown that the employer knew or should have known of the employee's propensity for the conduct which caused the injury. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Citing S.C. v New York City Dept. of Educ., 97 AD3d 518, 519-520, quoting Shor v Touch-N-Go Farms, Inc., 89 AD3d 830, the Appellate Division explained that in order "[to] establish a cause of action based on negligent hiring, negligent retention, or negligent supervision [of an employee], it must be shown that the employer knew or should have known of the employee's propensity for the conduct which caused the injury. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
was originally posted on Copyhype FootnotesGrant v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 4:16 am
. Criminal Practice - DNA Database and Databank Act of 1994 State v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 5:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 292(b) violated the Take Care Clause of the Constitution because it does not provide the Department of Justice with the adequate statutory controls under the “sufficient control” analysis of Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 1:02 pm
"In this case", began Lord Sumption in Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 46 (3 July 2013).   [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 11:09 am by Tobin Admin
This conclusion was further supported by a separate document providing guidance specific to statutes of limitation issued by the Supreme Court of Georgia three weeks later: Simply put, the tolling of a statute of limitation suspends the running of the period of limitation, but it does not reset the period of limitation. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:32 pm by constitutional lawblogger
Over a vigorous dissent from Judge Carolyn Dineen King, the two other judges on the panel in Doe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:32 am
The Second Circuit held that a student seeking relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act or under Title V based on a violation of Title III does not have to exhaust administrative remedies. [read post]