Search for: "Diamond v State" Results 481 - 500 of 990
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2013, 11:28 am by Ivan Cohen
The Court actually can sidestep a number of more difficult questions in patent law (about the precise meaning of the standard under Diamond v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Hansen spoke on behalf of the petitioners; General Verrilli on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae; Mr. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:45 am by Emily Fagiola
  In an internal email sent to all employees a few days after the lawsuit was filed he stated, “we have sold some high-quality diamonds that were signed or labeled using the word ‘Tiffany’. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Ron Coleman
The items sold by Costco were not in fact Tiffany items—not even in the way that other higher-end watches, for instance, sold by Costco are the real things (even if not every higher-end watchmaker is happy about it; see Omega S.A. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As the Supreme Court pointed out in KSR Int' l Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:35 am by Rob Merges
On the other hand, where there is sufficient intervention, we get a case like Diamond v. [read post]