Search for: "Joy v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 785
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 12:05 pm
Acadian Cypress & Hardwoods, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:23 am
Pranesh further criticized the decision of Justice Manmohan Singh of the Delhi High Court in John Wiley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
Thus "goodwill" is the attractive force that draws consumers to the brands and trade names of their choice; "benefit" is all too often a commodity that bears a financial price-tag; "relief" is not a state of mind but a court order, and so on. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
By Kyndra Joy Casper In California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 6:26 am
By Joy P. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:18 am
(August 5, 2013, S202828) ____ Cal.4th ____ By Kyndra Joy Casper On August 5, 2013, the California Supreme Court issued a split decision in Neighbors for Smart Rail v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 10:26 am
Posts about emotional well-being: While some courts have found that people who put their emotional state at issue are required to turn over a wide swath of their social media activity, this court takes a more restrictive view: The fact that an individual may express some degree of joy, happiness, or sociability on certain occasions sheds little light on the issue of whether he or she is actually suffering emotional distress. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:36 am
By Joy P. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 7:57 am
By way of background, Jewell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 8:05 am
Considered a "landmark case", Epperson v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 6:05 am
McBride v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
McElmurry v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:56 am
The article recites various reasons for the failure of the ad: (i) "[t]he company is moving away from upbeat ads promoting product features toward ones that identify it as a reliable provider of products"; (ii) Per Professor of |Advertising Edward Boches, "[i]n a manifesto ad, it's hard not to come across as self indulgent; (iii) "the ad lacks joy;"; (iv) the ad is too long; and (v) further referring to Professor Boches' observations, the ad's reference to the State of… [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Const., Amdt. 5; Bolling v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
Giacchetto v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
The ACLU is direct counsel in the DOMA case, United States v. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Frank Johns, Catherine Seal, Spencer Crona, Mary Joy Quinn, Howard S. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 1:42 pm
Except that Dopson-Troutt actually cited Hahn v. [read post]
