Search for: "State v. Seven" Results 5041 - 5060 of 11,120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, although Zurlo stated in his July 15, 2013 determination terminating Bruso's employment that Bishop had delegated her authority to him, Bishop and Zurlo affirmatively stated in their respective affidavits that the designation had occurred on July 22, 2013, seven days after Zurlo made the determination. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:50 pm by Ilya Somin
The State not only urges us to answer that question in the negative, but it also requests that we wholly abandon the proportionality framework from State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery
In a session cut short by a stay from the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the military commission in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
It includes: On December 7, 2015, the Trump campaign issued a press release stating that ‘Donald J. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
For example, the Supreme Court decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
McIlrath, No. 07-1266 Sentence for traveling across state lines to have sex with a minor is affirmed where: 1) remarks of the judge at sentencing discharged his duty to consider not only the sentencing guidelines, but [read post]
19 May 2015, 7:20 am by Bradley Joondeph
The internal consistency test had appeared in at least seven Supreme Court state tax decisions prior to this one. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 10:10 am by Lyle Denniston
The decision in the case of Arizona v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 2:26 pm by Matt Danzer
These are charges seven through nine on the charge sheet for those keeping track at home. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 2:00 am by Tammy Binford
The court ruled on April 30 in the appeal of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]