Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 5061 - 5080 of 8,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 2:46 pm by Daniel Cappetta
L. c. 233, § 20, states that a person cannot be compelled to testify against his or her spouse. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 12:59 pm
[…] On May 29, 2013, Defendants filed a motion to stay district court proceedings pursuant to AIA § 18(b)(1). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:33 am by Joy Waltemath
Specifically, they asserted that by rounding down, the time-keeping system undercounted an employee’s actual time by as much as 20 minutes per day. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:24 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  For Dryer, a 24- minute production, “Game of the Week 1969 Week #1 Vikings vs. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 1:45 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Background  Following the April 20, 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, BP shareholders filed a number of lawsuits against the company and certain of its affiliates and officials seeking to recover for their financial losses. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 4:49 pm
A Nassau DWI Lawyer said that, on October 2, 1958, petitioner was charged, in the District Court of Nassau County, with a violation of § 20, sub. 4 and § 11, sub. 1 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law of the State of New York, each being misdemeanors. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In other words, what would a reasonable person do in the defendant’s shoes? [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 9:17 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
In other words, what would a reasonable person do in the defendant’s shoes? [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/mwWyg2HtjZ -> Google Settles With FTC Over In-App Purchases Dispute http://t.co/pWEmHlWhwb -> Weight loss firm demands $1 million from website hosting negative reviews http://t.co/59u9VFS2SI -> Patent troll gives up, can’t defend “matchmaking” patent under new law http://t.co/VYC8GYPJFz -> Distinguishing between cyberlockers and legitimate cloud storage services http://t.co/rzr9dXLyG3 -> Bitcoin accepted here? [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 7:18 am by Doorey
 It Tory MP Russ Hiebert Defends Controversial Bill C377 singles out unions for special adverse treatment in the form of a requirement to prepare and submit over 20 detailed documents describing every payment over $5000, the name of the person who received the money, how union employees spend their time at work, and so on and so on. [read post]