Search for: "Does 1 - 29"
Results 501 - 520
of 13,780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 1:23 am
In no. 2, I liked a) data subject for Betroffene(r) (No. 1 had affected party - I was going to use person affected, although I see I had already got data subject in my database) b) Bußgeldvorschriften and Strafvorschriften, as headings, translated as Administrative offences and Criminal offences (No. 1 had Administrative Fine Provisions and Penalty Provisions) c) Translation of section 43 (5): entgegen § 29 Abs. 2 Satz 3 oder 4 die dort bezeichneten… [read post]
6 May 2008, 4:30 am
Sec. 1051(a)(1) and Trademark Rule 2.52. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
§ 207(p)(1), 29 C.F.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Both agree with the decision, but add their own twists to the case. 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 7:50 am
If Question 1 is answered in the negative: 2.1 Does a scheme establish 'fair compensation' for the purposes of Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC if the right specified in Question 1(a) applies only where recording media are marketed to natural persons who use the recording media to make reproductions for private purposes? [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
§213(a)(1) and 29 C.F.R. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:02 pm
Friday, July 2 – Brnovich Thursday, July 1 – AFP v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 1:28 am
Kingsley Egbuonu's A to Z trek round African official IP websites on behalf of Afro-IP takes him to Mali, where the local copyright office does indeed have a web presence even if its IP office doesn't. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 10:55 am
Investment Fraud Lawyer, Jake Zamasnky, Breaks Down Investment Fraud and FINRA Arbitration in Episode 1 of The Investment Lawyer Speaks Episode 1 Transcript 00:28 – Nancy Rapp, PaperStreet Hello, welcome to the Investment Lawyer Speaks a podcast produced by the Zamansky Law Firm. [read post]
13 May 2021, 11:39 pm
The employee would also begin to recoup additional days beginning on June 1, 2009, and additional days beginning on December 1, 2009. 29 CFR 825.200(c) The answer: Here, the employee begins recouping time on February 1, 2009 (a new 12-month FMLA period) in the same manner and amounts it was used the previous year. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 8:01 am
However, the rules do not take effect until January 1, 2024. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 8:01 am
However, the rules do not take effect until January 1, 2024. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 4:28 pm
§ 213(a)(1)) does not grant the Department the authority to use a salary-level test or an automatic updating mechanism under its revised overtime rule. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:20 am
The exclusionary rule does not apply to prevent the use of DNA from a convict that was not taken until weeks after his release from prison that was used to match to another crime. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:23 am
The exclusionary rule does not apply to prevent the use of DNA from a convict that was not taken until weeks after his release from prison that was used to match to another crime. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 9:17 am
One of ESMA’s main objections is that Article 29(1)(a) entitles EU home competent authorities to approve prospectuses from third countries, if the information requirements imposed by those third country laws are equivalent to the requirements of the Prospectus Regulation (equivalent third countries). [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:49 am
Amazon.com, Inc., 1-15-cv-00154 (TXWD February 29, 2016, Order) (Pitman, M.J.) [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
§ 203(y)(1). [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 6:15 am
In 2005, there were 38,476 new privately owned housing units authorized for construction (this accounts for everything from 1 unit buildings to structures with 5 or more units). 29 Indiana construction workers died on the job that year. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 6:54 pm
See ’360 patent claim 1.But those additional requirements do not mean that the“bond layer” does not also have to bond. [read post]
