Search for: "In Re Medical Review Panel"
Results 501 - 520
of 893
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2015, 8:30 pm
WCC Official Hospital and Ambulatory Surgical Center Fee Schedule Memorandum - December 31, 2014 MEMORANDUM NO. 2014-06 TO: WCC Commissioners, Facility Fee Schedule Core Committee Members, District Administrators, Advisory Board, Legal Advisory Panel, Medical Advisory Panel, Medical Practitioners, Self-Insureds, Insurance Carriers, Medical Care Plans, Attorneys, and Unions. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 7:10 pm
Chamber of Commerce (the Chamber); the International Medical Graduate Taskforce (IMGT); the Center for American Progress (CAP) and the Global Workers Justice Alliance (GWJA). [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:59 pm
Review time-lines are uncertain. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:09 am
None of these physicians had any clue about workers' compensation regulation of their professional activity.No wonder Utilization Review and Independent Medical Review are such road blocks - the physicians that are supposed to be complying with various standards don't even know a) that there are standards, or b) how to comply.Ugh! [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:32 am
Carriers are still making money and the California market remains near a quarter of the entire nation's written premium.It's easy to say that SB 863 hasn't delivered on its promises - promises that should have saved the California system a half billion dollars in the first year but didn't.It's also easy to say that we still need to wait and see, as participants adjust to Independent Medical Review and other provisions that shocked the system.And what if I… [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
” In re Seagate Tech., LLC, 497 F.3d 1360, 1371(Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 2:36 pm
They will use utilization review panels to do a review of the reasonable charges on in the community. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
A panel of experts will outline the pros and cons to set the stage for a lively discussion about an issue that is far more complex than it seems. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 10:31 am
He founded theNNT.com, an independent group of physicians who analyze the effectiveness of medical therapies. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 4:52 am
A three-judge panel on the U.S. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm
At its Conference on December 12, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as removability under the Class Action Fairness Act, the constitutionality of an Arizona law limiting the availability of abortions performed with medication, and the presumption of judicial vindictiveness under North Carolina v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 1:53 pm
"We're now much more aware that we need to be more vigilant," Wu said. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:34 am
Maybe folks need to step back a bit and understand what it is they're being asked to do. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:16 am
At that point, the claims administrator has 10 days to send a copy of all the worker's medical records in its possession that are "relevant" to:The worker's current medical condition.The medical treatment provided by the employer.The disputed medical treatment requested by the worker.The claims handler must also send a copy of all information sent to the worker explaining the decision regarding the disputed treatment, all materials the injured… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:45 am
Cockrum, an attorney with Frost Brown Todd LLC in Louisville, Kentucky, said that although the full 6th Circuit might review the ruling, the current split among the circuits may give the Supreme Court justices a ruling they’re eager to review. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:31 am
The appellate court panel noted that equitable tolling did not require the defendant to be at fault, relevant as Plunkett in no way impeded or deceived American Family. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 8:39 am
The governor can and should order a more comprehensive review. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 12:00 am
In re N.A.D. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Indeed, the Board of Trustees of the American Medical Association has recommended that the presentation of expert testimony should be considered part of the practice of medicine and thus subject to peer review[8]. [read post]
