Search for: "State v. Brain "
Results 521 - 540
of 2,676
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2009, 2:07 am
Last week, the appellate court upheld the verdict in its entirety in Sadhwani v. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 12:00 pm
State v Urgrovics2. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 10:14 am
CM23-0069500 (6-26-2023) Home Health Care Services—Traumatic Brain Injury—Applicant, 34 years old, suffered an industrial traumatic brain injury on 9/20/2021, resulting in significant physical and cognitive symptoms…[LexisNexis Commentary: The MTUS/ACOEM Traumatic Brain Injury Guidelines have a section entitled “Home Healthcare” that states only: “See Initial Approaches to Treatment Guideline” (ACOEM Traumatic… [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 6:14 am
He was dying of brain cancer. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 4:08 am
In his December 26, 2012, written opinion in CPAN and BIAMI v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:15 am
Rayfield v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 8:47 am
And last week an administrative judge upheld that decision (C.C. v. [read post]
21 May 2011, 12:08 pm
The legal humor blog Big Legal Brain and [non-defendant at this stage] C. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 2:11 pm
That's what their brain processes. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 5:17 am
Consider for example in Casias v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:56 am
We hold that the state court’s rejection of Ferrell’s ineffective-assistance claims was an unreasonable application of Strickland v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Briefly, the appellant suffered severe brain damage after getting into difficulty during the course of a school swimming lesson. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
Briefly, the appellant suffered severe brain damage after getting into difficulty during the course of a school swimming lesson. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:00 am
Eisenhauer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 12:00 pm
In a 5-4 decision in Shoop v. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 9:03 pm
Summary of the Majority Decision The dispute involved a patient who experienced severe brain damage from an infection following the removal of a benign tumour, resulting in what the physicians called a persistent vegetative state. [read post]
19 May 2010, 4:10 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:07 pm
In Halo v. [read post]
