Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 5501 - 5520 of 13,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2021, 4:51 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Microsoft at the CAFC: Parallel Networks Licensing, LLC, appeals a United States District Court for the District of Delaware order awarding costs under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 2:26 am
AereoKiller, LLC, United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, No. 15-56420, 21 March 2017Kluwer Copyright Blog updates on the ruling that reversed the decision of the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 534 n.19 (1994) that include frivolousness, motivation, objective unreasonableness and considerations of compensation and deterrence. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 8:43 am
If it is approved, he said, it could be appealed in the courts. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 6:14 am by John Jascob
The petition details that review scheme, including that under the statute a respondent “may obtain review of the order in the United States Court of Appeals for the circuit in which he resides or has his principal place of business, or for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Ruiz, through his employee organization, demanded that the matter of his termination be submitted to arbitration under color of terms set out in collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the County and United Federation of Police Officers, Inc., Local 613, [Union], of which Ruiz was a member. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:53 pm
United States, No. 08-1575 "In proceedings arising from a denial of petitioner's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion to vacate his guilty plea and sentence, government's motion to dismiss defendant's appeal for lack of jurisdiction is denied where defendant's notice of appeal was considered to have been timely filed. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 7:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
(“SkinMedica”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California granting Histogen, Inc., Histogen Aesthetics, and Gail Naughton (collectively “Histogen”) summary judgment of noninfringement of the asserted claims of U.S. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:27 am by familoo
The best known of these cases are: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1977] RPC1; Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360; Datec Electronics Holdings Ltd v United Parcels Service Ltd [2007] UKHL 23 [2007] 1 WLR 1325; Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Threshold Criteria) [2013] UKSC 33 [2013] 1 WLR 1911 and most recently and comprehensively McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 58 [2013] 1 WLR 2477. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:32 pm
Only the first set--"information transmitter" and "recognition device"--is challenged on appeal. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:09 am by Tom
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 500 U.S. 618 (2007). [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
"   "Strict privity, as applied in the context of estate planning malpractice actions, is a minority rule in the United States [FN1]. [read post]