Search for: "FELTS v. STATE"
Results 541 - 560
of 6,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2022, 7:35 am
In the recent decision of Humphrey v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 1:20 pm
In the R v Le case, the court considered the fact that Mr. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:29 am
”] From today's opinion by Judge Gregory Woods in Flynn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Jackson Women’s Health Org., SA felt empowered to inject a current conservative Christian perspective on “life” into our legal system. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
-W. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 12:32 pm
See, e.g., Aday v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
In the aftermath of Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:25 am
” Crownover v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:03 pm
” Moore v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts tried (obviously unsuccessfully) to avoid the complete overturning of Roe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On the same day, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWCA Civ 1073, dismissing by a majority the appeal from the decision of Nicol J, which struck out the Appellant’s claims in libel and data protection as abuse. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:37 pm
From Sandmann v. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 8:11 am
The court’s decision in Unicolors, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements could again be trusted. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
Hacon HHJ was not convinced by JCB’s argument, stating (see [56]) that where the evidence otherwise suggests that a claimed invention was obvious at the priority date, an argument of long felt want can only negate that evidence if there is no plausible reason, other than that the invention was not obvious, for the invention having not been performed during the relevant period. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 1:39 pm
The parties in Leonard v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 3:30 am
Plus, state (and local) law may impose more restrictions beyond Title VII. [read post]
