Search for: "Dept of EEOC" Results 41 - 60 of 87
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
September 8, 2009)White motor vehicle operator flips dismissal of his race/promotion + HWE claimsNew York StateDECIDED NYDHR rejects fem cop's discrimination claim against Utica Judge approves class action status for females in sex discrimination suit vs Sterling Jewelers Suffolk in the news twice: (1) Jury gives $450K to Suffolk County cop for disability-based promotion denial; (2) female Suffolk Park cop wins jury verdict for pregnancy-based denial of light duty… [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
EEOC (06-1037), Virginia v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 5:23 am
Dept. of Admin., 44 F.3d 538, 544 (7th Cir.1995) (adopting a presumption against working from home except in “extraordinary circumstances”) with Humphrey v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Jan. 15, 2009)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Black fem Director's HWE claims etc* EEOC v Agro Distribution LLC, No. 07-60447 (5th Cir. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 8:39 am by Richard Santalesa
Case Studies From the Dept of the Treasury, EEOC and the State of Delaware  While the Toolkit doesn’t explain why the three case studies provided were selected, other than that they “highlight the successful implementation of a BYOD pilot or program at a government agency,” each provides a useful brief synopsis of “the specific challenges, approaches, and lessons learned. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Jan. 21, 2009)(Unpub)Reversing dismissal of Dept Public Works ee's pro se race discrim complaint>> Rambacher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Foley & Lardner8th Cir.o Appellate Court Upholds EEOC's Religious Bias Verdict against AT&T EEOC v AT&TD.C. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
The Dept. of Labor informed the defendant that it had to employ the plaintiff for at least 180 days upon his return from active service, which it did, and once the 180 days were up it re-terminated the plaintiff. [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 3:43 am by SHG
That the EEOC understood its authority to include silencing speech raised an obvious problem, yet one with which the EEOC showed neither sensitivity nor concern. [read post]