Search for: "In the Matter of James R. Miller -"
Results 41 - 60
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal Abrupt Change to Census Deadline Could Result in an Undercount of Latino and Black Communities Philadelphia Inquirer – Jose Del Real and Fredrick Kunkle (Washington Post) | Published: 8/9/2020 Census experts and advocates warn the Trump administration’s decision to end the decennial count a month earlier than expected will result in a dramatic undercount of Black and Latino communities across the country, which could have grave effects on federal funding and… [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
Inquiring minds wonder how the peer review committee ever became so unbalanced, but I suspect that asymmetrical evaluation of conflicts of interest had a lot to do with it.[5] [1] James Hanley, Corbett McDonald, and Margaret R. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
R. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
Wired had a piece “The UK’s war on online harms seems destined to fudge and fail” The judgment in the case of R (Miller) v College of Policing [2020] EWHC 225 (Admin) concerning the logging of “non-crime” hate incidents attracted wide publicity, with the press (and a Downing Street spokesman) commending the Judge’s robust approach to freedom of expression. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm
Miller, the Supreme Court held that whether an amendment was properly ratified was a nonjusticiable political question, committed to Congress, not the Court. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 3:55 pm
Stating the third element differently, the misrepresentation must "concern matters whose risk and responsibility did not relate to the quality or the characteristics of the goods for which the parties contracted or otherwise involved performance of the contract. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:11 pm
Federal Judge James E. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
(Shout out to R. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
The matter should not have to come back before the court. 1511: Lord Pannick QC we have asked for an order that the advice given by the Prime Minister to her Majesty was unlawful. 1507: Lady Hale advises Lord Pannick QC to make the assumption that the court will make a decision as quickly as possible. 1500: Lord Pannick submits that if the Court makes the declaration as requested then Parliament would be reassembled as soon a possible next week, and it would be for Parliament to decide… [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Aidan O’Neill QC confirms definitely not, but the court should find against it. 1415: Aidan O’Neill QC submits the banner of the law, chosen to symbolise what the UKSC is about, states that the rule of law matters. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
(Pix Credit Here: Carnival Cruises Faces More Lawsuits over Cuba Trips)It has been only several months since the Trump Administration announced that it would no longer suspend the U.S. law provisions that allow lawsuits in U.S. courts against foreign companies in Cuba that use properties confiscated from Cuban Americans and other U.S. citizens after 1959 (discussed here: The Pivot Toward the Caribbean: Announcement of Permission to Sue Anyone Using American Property Confiscated by Cuba and the… [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the judges in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union therefore erred when concluding that the triggering of Article 50 “is a bullet that cannot be withdrawn. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, noting it is consistent with the UK Government position. 1449: David Johnston QC refers to the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011 in accordance with which dissolution must take place. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am
See also Miller v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 6:54 am
Karl R. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 6:41 am
District Judge Gray Miller of the Southern District of Texas.The lawsuit was filed in 2013 against the Selective Service System by Texas resident James Lesmeister, who later added San Diego resident Anthony Davis and the San Diego-based National Coalition for Men as additional plaintiffs.... [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
The Appeal In a unanimous decision authored by Judge James P. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Chesler, James Stewart, and Geoffrey T. [read post]
