Search for: "Smith v. Harris et al"
Results 41 - 60
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2008, 9:46 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Howard Harris v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
Cassens, et al Eastern District of Michigan at DetroitWIRE FRAUDJULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
HARRIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 10:54 am
Ingerman Smith LLP et al., CV 2012-0307 (ILG) (MDG) (E.D.N.Y. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 12:09 pm
Smith, No. 06-0948 (Tex. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm
’s Office v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:59 am
Diamond, MD, et al., “Uncertain Effects of Rosiglitazone on the Risk for Myocardial Infarction and Cardiovascular Death,” 147 Ann. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Mohr, et. al. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
One moved out: The Court denied without recorded dissent in two-time relist Smith v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Hitachi et al (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC sets new test for ‘inequitable’ patent prosecution: Therasense v Becton, Dickinson & Co (JIPLP) CAFC validity determination undone by appellant via patent reexamination? [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
Bissell Homecare, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB sustains 2(d) opposition, finding SWEDISH LUXERY and SWEDISH SLEEP SYSTEM confusingly similar for mattresses: Tempur-Pedic International Inc., et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 10:26 am
In Dennis Smith v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 10:52 pm
Barris et al: fielding occasional calls about one’s job is a “professional courtesy” that does not interfere with FMLA rights (FMLA claims dismissed) Persson v. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
Wal-Mart Stores Inc, et al (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Inventor/plaintiff’s Managing Director not given highly confidential technical information: McDavid Knee Guard Inc v Nike USA Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Pennsylvania: Warsaw Orthpedic awarded $2M in Globus patent dispute (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas: ‘I have good cause but it’s a secret’… [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm
See Brief for Amicus Curiae MacArthur Justice Center, et al. [read post]
