Search for: "TRIAL AND ERRORS, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 3,621
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2023, 1:30 pm
While Baxalta tried to argue its screening process does not require the type of trial and error described in Amgen and instead “predictably and reliably generates new claimed antibodies every time it is performed,” the court said “this does not take the process out of the realm of the trial-and-error approaches rejected in Amgen. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 5:41 am
Inc. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 9:34 am
Underwriters, Inc. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:06 am
“An error in a ruling of the court shall be disregarded if a substantial right of a party is not prejudiced” (CPLR 2002). [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Lehigh Valley Health Network, Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:00 pm
In Rambus, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 2:47 pm
Inc. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:48 am
In Gannett Co., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 5:16 pm
First Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a trial court's decision to dismiss an age discrimination case against Novartis Ex-Lax, Inc. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
From June through August 2015, the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board issued eleven precedential decisions. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
From June through August 2015, the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board issued eleven precedential decisions. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
The trial court sustained the objection and the reviewing court found no error in this ruling because ex parte affidavits are not admissible in contested cases. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 7:48 pm
Sandoz, Inc.), the Federal Circuit has increased the quantum of explanation it requires from district courts (and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board even more frequently) in reviewing questions of fact for clear error (see, e.g., Tris Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 7:15 am
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) affirmed a decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) that denied registration of Stratus Networks, Inc. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 6:52 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:14 pm
Following a six-day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant Plantronics, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2020, 8:02 am
Plaintiffs argue the district court (which held a bench trial) did not award enough money, and defendants claim the trial court made unrelated errors. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 7:04 am
Google, Inc., 3-12-cv-00504 (NVD October 10, 2013, Order) (Cooke, M.J.) [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:19 am
In Fresh Express Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 12:59 pm
RS&H Inc., before the Fla. 5th DCA. [read post]
