Search for: "University Oral "
Results 41 - 60
of 6,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 3:38 pm
Kavanaugh agreed with Gorsuch that a ban on universal injunctions “could somewhat reduce the number of emergency applications that make it to this Court and require the Court to assess the merits,” but he did not regard a ban as a complete panacea. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
As Justice John Roberts said at oral argument, Corner Post’s rule would open regulations to challenges “20 years later” and require courts to “create the universe” of rules “repeatedly,” as opposed to having the certainty of known “ground rules. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:41 pm
On March 26th of this year, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided that further review in Amazon Logistics v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Last week, an Indiana appeals court ruled in favor of a group of plaintiffs who challenged the state’s restrictive abortion law on the ground that it interfered with their right to religious freedom. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 5:32 am
The courtroom drama marked another unexpected turn in the case against Kohberger, who is accused of fatally stabbing four University of Idaho students in November 2022. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:03 pm
To make matters worse, OCA issued—orally at a conference of accountants—a multi-pronged framework for applying SAB 121 to broker-dealers. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:23 am
Last week at the Supreme Court, the Comstock Act of 1873 was referenced... during oral arguments in a case dealing with access to... drugs... used in medication abortions. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 2:30 pm
Oral Arg. at 04:19–04:23; 34:04–34:28, https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/OralArgRecordings/22/22-10942_10-4-2023.mp3. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 6:36 am
” “The firm’s ‘apparent conflicts of interest permeated FTX’s bankruptcy filing and every aspect of the case,’ Jonathan Lipson of Temple University and David Skeel of the University of Pennsylvania wrote in a paper published online earlier this month. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at the George Washington University Law School. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
In her oral evidence to the House of Commons’ Culture, Media and Sport Committee last March, Dame Melanie stated that “the phrase ‘freedom of expression’ is a very important part of this debate – one that perhaps should be a little bit more prominent”. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:30 pm
The second, a virtual lecture and conversation with Alison LaCroix, University of Chicago Law School, draws upon her forthcoming book, The Interbellum Constitution: Union, Commerce, and Slavery in the Age of Federalisms and will take place at Noon (EST) on May 29.Columbia University's "Incite" project reimagines oral hist with its Oral History of the Obama Presidency, undertaken in partnership with the Obama Foundation. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 5:05 pm
I last attended oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the Trump v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:12 pm
During roughly 90 minutes of oral arguments, a majority of the justices appeared ready to throw out the dispute over the FDA’s expansion of access to the drug in 2016 and 2021 because the challengers in the case – several individual doctors and groups of doctors who are opposed to abortion on religious or moral grounds – do not have a legal right to sue, known as standing. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:37 am
“We've had...a rash of universal injunctions... [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
[Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 1:15 pm
If Corner Post obtains relief, that relief will be universal in a sense. [read post]
The Free Speech Trifecta: How the Court Could Fundamentally Alter Free Speech in Three Pending Cases
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
That is why these oral arguments had some alarming moments. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court then granted cert and oral argument is tomorrow. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Anderson bars states from enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against presidential candidates, it does not prevent a state from adopting and enforcing, as a matter of state law, a bar to presidential ballots candidates who held past office and violated their oaths by engaging in insurrection.At oral argument, Chief Justice Roberts raised a related uniformity concern. [read post]
