Search for: "v. WEINTRAUB"
Results 41 - 60
of 166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2014, 8:30 pm
In Weintraub. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 2:07 pm
The jury hearing Hermes v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:53 am
Michale Hemmer, Daniel Josephe, Louis Pohoryles, Brent Polkes, Linda Skalet and Jon Weintraub are several residents who challenged a developer’s plan seeking to re-zone an area of land from single use residential to a multifamily residential use. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:14 am
Weintraub v Petervary 2017 NY Slip Op 51595(U) Decided on November 16, 2017 Appellate Term, Second Department is an example of how lower courts over-determine cases in favor of the attorney and to the detriment of the client. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:57 pm
However, the court concluded the date stamp controlled and certified conflict with Weintraub v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 1:25 pm
The recent Reilly v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
In Blue Mountain Holdings v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:23 pm
David Gabor is a shareholder at Weintraub Tobin. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 4:00 am
County awarded attorney fees and costs as the prevailing party in a civil rights actionCarter v Village of Ocean Beach, USCA, 2nd Circuit, #13,815Plaintiffs, former seasonal and part-time police officers of the Village of Ocean Beach, sued the Village and County and various officers and employees of those entities alleging multiple wrongful termination and defamation. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 1:46 pm
On July 17, 2023, the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Hunley v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 8:25 am
Supreme Court held in CFTC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:13 am
"The Court of Appeals said that §803(d) has not been read as a limitation on the witnesses DOI may subpoena, citing Matter of Weintraub v Fraiman, 30 AD2d 784, aff'd 24 NY2d 918.The Weintraub decision holds that DOI's inquisitorial power "reaches any person, even though unconnected with city employment, when there are grounds present to sustain a belief such person has information relative to the subject matter of the investigation. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 7:05 am
The case is Caro v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 11:28 pm
"The Court of Appeals said that §803(d) has not been read as a limitation on the witnesses DOI may subpoena, citing Matter of Weintraub v Fraiman, 30 AD2d 784, aff’d 24 NY2d 918.The Weintraub decision holds that DOI’s inquisitorial power "reaches any person, even though unconnected with city employment, when there are grounds present to sustain a belief such person has information relative to the subject matter of the investigation. [read post]
17 May 2021, 6:35 am
Four years later, the Second Circuit further tightened the legal standard, in Weintraub v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm
linkKylie Minogue v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:57 pm
[As a small diversion, this issue arose in a comment by Josh Escovedo in a Weintraub CLE on Feb. 25, 2021.] [read post]
19 May 2023, 1:58 pm
Ford Astley v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:00 am
Daniel Walsh of the Advertising Specialty Institute has a very thoughtful and comprehensive article on the litigation background of American Needle v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:04 pm
Watch this episode on the Weintraub YouTube channel here: [read post]
