Search for: "CO.1. Means"
Results 6001 - 6020
of 16,765
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2018, 10:28 am
[1] McLeod v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
This blog post was written by a former co-worker of mine, Kathy Manley. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:21 am
The Agency states that its goal is to “mirror” a contractor’s compensation system, but that where it is unable to do so, it will turn to AAP or EEO-1 groupings even if those broad categories unquestionably include employees who are not doing similar work within the meaning of Title VII (e.g., all “Professionals”). [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:36 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
Co. of the Southwest v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:30 pm
Ct., Suffolk Co., decided 1/4/2010) Defendant Hub Truck Rental Corp. rented a commercial truck that was involved in a motor vehicle accident. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 10:11 am
That means there are things in it that are relevant to what we do. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 11:54 pm
Massey Coal Co., No. 08-22. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:07 pm
That means an individual can leave $5.49 million to heirs and pay no federal estate or gift tax. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 8:38 am
Among the more interesting: (1) the insistence on the fiction that state owned enterprises ought to be treated as autonomous of its state owners; (3) the willingness to extend the principle of extraterritoriality through the privatization of European rules enforced within production chain apex corporations without regard to conflicts with the domestic legal orders of host states where this privatized European private law will be implemented; (3) a determination to use extraterritoriality… [read post]
16 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
Id. cmt. 1. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
The classification of merchandise “involves two underlying steps: (1) determining the proper meaning of the tariff provisions, which is a question of law; and (2) determining which heading the particular merchandise falls within, which is a question of fact. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
As for the co-blogger’s quip about Bexis’ “active, muscular vacations” well, in this instance that’s probably right. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 6:54 am
§ 2254(d)(1). [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
National Gypsum Co., 739 F. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Becton, Dickinson and Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
" And that is all that the Texas complaint seeks by way of relief -- it expressly does not seek to have the Court adjudicate which candidate won the election.Many of the opposition briefs filed in the Supreme Court exaggerate and distort the limited relief which Texas and its co-plaintiffs seek from the complaint. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:17 am
As Dr Martin Schlötelburg, the co-ordinator of OHIM’s Designs Department, has written, “the selection of the means for representing a design is equivalent to the drafting of the claims in a patent: including features means claiming them”...He continues:32. ... [read post]
