Search for: "Study v. State" Results 6301 - 6320 of 15,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2016, 6:33 am
State, 336 Ga.App. 428, 429, 785 S.E.2d 84 (Georgia Court of Appeals 2016).DeGeorgis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:01 pm
The course of study for the Hague Academy of International Law's 2017 Summer Program is now available. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Supp. 3d 239, 246 (E.D.N.Y. 2015) (finding error rates between 0.9 and 1.5% to favor admission of expert testimony); United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 7:10 am by HR Hero
Business groups filed a similar legal challenge, but the cases were consolidated in State of Nevada v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 6:50 am by Joy Waltemath
In support of their disparate impact claim, the employees cited some research studies showing that women in male-dominated occupations tend to be “disproportionately devalued” when the evaluators are men (Moussouris v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This is a case study on the problems that can arise when public records requirements meet modern forms of communications. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
A prime example was Bush v Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court was called on to resolve an election dispute. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:59 am by Chuck Cosson
  The impact of mobile commerce, especially on the developing world, is substantial and could be even more so in the future:  a McKinsey study puts the impact of digital financial technologies – many of which rely on mobile phones – at $3.7 trillion dollars.[7] Mobility affects commerce beyond simply transactions on a digital mobile device. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 6:09 am by Amy Howe
Last week the federal government recommended that the court grant review in Impression Products v. [read post]