Search for: "RIDER v. STATE"
Results 621 - 640
of 785
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 12:23 pm
Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Cir. 2007): Gamco alleged infringement by Multimedia’s central determinant system, as operated in the New York State Lottery. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 2:41 am
Stated otherwise, what is the relationship between trademark awareness and brand strength? [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:31 am
They were bolstered in that position by the Supreme Court’s June 2022 decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:19 pm
General Motors LLC v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:10 am
v=d8CAKAXR-AMAfter that, it was back to the convention center for the exhibits. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am
This could be an interesting case - and reminds the CopyKat of the recent decision by Mr Justice Birss in Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd & another [2012] EWPCC 1 where infringement was found, and the decision by a Korean appellate court that found that the 'recreation' of a photograph of a natural scene of pine trees on an island set against a skyline could not be infringement - although neither of those cases took 28 years to… [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:39 pm
The United States Congress has practically concluded its 117th term without passing the Open App Markets Act (OAMA) into law. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 3:36 pm
Look at Apple, Apple has a huge market share in the United States where are they going to grow, they want to grow by capturing the middle class that’s coming out in China right now and selling them iPhones. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:46 am
” Demos v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:29 pm
She wrote the court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:30 am
Wild TV 2016 NSSC 315 https://t.co/wrfJ2ijFAA -> Federal district court upholds 'clickwrap' employment agreements in ADP LLC v Lynch, No 2, 2016 cv 01053 https://t.co/u0afkpzoPi -> Uber Riders Suffer a Setback in Federal Court over app terms https://t.co/TP2iWNTtFk -> Link to Uber decision enforcing its clickwrap agreement in app https://t.co/RCCpPLinr7 -> 11 Artists Sue Fashion Retailer Francesca’s for Copyright Infringement https://t.co/NBZgb5a0jv… [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:54 am
Here, in a nutshell, is what the Court said:Adequacy of Board of Appeal’s statement of reasons The General Court had no problem finding that the Board's statement of reasons was perfectly adequate, adding that the duty to state reasons for decisions is an essential procedural requirement, the reasoning of a decision consisting in a formal statement of the grounds on which that decision is based. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 5:42 am
For an interesting recent case dealing with this question, see AFDI v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 2:03 pm
” Regardless of the science, Republican lawmakers and even presidential candidate Rick Perry endorsed the fetal pain concept in order to challenge the Roe v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 7:49 am
See, e.g., Foday v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Fortunately, the unanimous three-judge appellate panel in Paletta v. [read post]
