Search for: "District Equities, LLC" Results 641 - 660 of 902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
POLK MECHANICAL COMPANY, LLC; from Bexar County;4th district (04-08-00509-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 07-01-09, pet. denied Oct 2009)(limitations discovery rule, standing issue as basis for summary judgment)09-0718 R.W. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:34 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The Labor Department sued Ali & Companies LLC and its owner, Ali Haider, in the U.S. [read post]
21 May 2024, 6:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “In Monday’s filing in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the firm said FTX investors have still made no accusation that Sullivan & Cromwell had knowledge of any fraud while performing certain legal services. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
”However, even the corporate chart provided in the Delaware complaint shows that what apparently really happened is that the Jaffe Group’s 50% partnership interest in Tropicana Enterprises was divided and transferred to two newly formed companies, Tropicana Real Estate Co., LLC (acquiring a 40% interest in Tropicana Enterprises) and Tropicana Development Co., LLC (acquiring the remaining 10% interest in Tropicana Enterprises). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:22 am by The Public Employment Law Press
She previously served as an Assistant District Attorney in Gangs/Major Case/Homicide Bureau of the Bronx County District Attorney’s Office. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
Supreme Court’s recent prior decisions in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 1:19 pm by SteinMcewen, LLP
The District of Montana found that Flexible was likely to succeed on the merits, and that the public interest and equities both supported an injunction save for purposes of the Air Force bidding, which Flexible had shown no interest in participating in. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:28 am by SHG
  Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate any irreparable harm as a result of the merger or that the balance of equities tipped at all, let alone sharply in their favor.The plaintiffs did not demonstrate in any way that they themselves would suffer any specific harm were preliminary injunctive relief denied. [read post]