Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 641 - 660 of 9,017
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
  The forum selection clause stated, in bolded, all capital letters, that: Franchisee and its owners agree that Link may institute any action against Franchisee or its owners in any state or federal court of general jurisdiction in (a) the State of Texas, or (b) in the state where Franchisee has its principal place of business, or (c) within such state and in the judicial district in which Link has its principal place… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:04 pm by Eric Citron
And the Supreme Court even held in 2005 in National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 7:44 am by Eugene Volokh
{In the Complaint, Robe Probe (also called Judicial Felons Watch) describes itself as a national watch dog that polices judicial abuses, judicial fraud, judicial corruption, and judicial felonies and monitors corrupt state court judges nationwide.} [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:34 am by Michael C. Dorf
The majority noted how state court judicial review under state constitutions was well known by the Constitution's framers and was part of the backdrop for the SCOTUS decision in Marbury v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an 85-page opinion filed March 25, and modified and certified for partial publication on April 23, 2021, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Napa County Superior Court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the County’s EIR and approvals for an expansion of Syar Industries, Inc. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 3:50 pm by Jacek Stramski
By Herron Bond The Supreme Court of Florida has accepted discretionary jurisdiction to resolve constitutional challenges to the First District Court of Appeal’s en banc ruling in Westphal v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
  Analysis: First, we should keep our eye on a larger trend toward limiting liability in U.S. courts for foreign wrongs. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:16 am
It went on to find that the district court rule barred the webcast that the Judicial Council wasn't required to give notice of its resolution, and that the Judicial Conference resolution, although not binding, was entitled to great deference.The court held that there were no constitutional issues involved.In a concurring opinion, Judge Lipez stated that the rule should be reexamined in light of technological advances since its adoption.April… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 6:38 am by MBettman
On January 23, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Schachtman
The Federal Judicial Center, and its state court counterparts, have work to do. [read post]